10/28 LONDON, (Reuter), With Permission A British judge, ruling in a landmark case brought by a journalist against his former employers, said on Thursday there was no such condition as Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI). In a 90-minute verdict, Judge John Prosser said RSI was a glibly-used label that was "meaningless" and had "no place in the medical books." He ruled against financial reporter Rafiq Mughal, 44, who had claimed damages and lost earnings from the international news and information agency Reuters, at whose headquarters in London he worked from 1987 to 1989. The judge described Reuters as prudent and careful employers and said that a painful condition in Mughal's arms and shoulders was due to personal factors rather than conditions at work. Mughal, who was not in court, has not worked since he accepted redundancy from Reuters in late 1989. Mughal, who is married with three children, told the judge during a week-long hearing in June that he had been in constant pain since developing RSI in 1988 and could still not carry out simple household tasks. His case was supported by Britain's National Union of Journalists (NUJ), which will be responsible for defence costs incurred by Reuters of more than 100,000 pounds ($150,000). The judge was told after the ruling that Mughal had turned down an offer of 20,000 pounds ($30,000) to settle out of court. The judgment was a major setback for journalists and other keyboard operators suffering from painful wrist and arm conditions that they believe are linked to the persistent use of computer editing terminals. The judge said medical opinion was divided over RSI, but he was most impressed by a hand surgeon who had given evidence on behalf of Reuters and had stated: "RSI is not a disease or diagnosis, but a label." The judge added: "RSI is in reality meaningless in that it has no pathology. RSI is too easy a term to use and its use serves to confuse...anyone can call anything RSI." A spokesman for the NUJ, which has 73 other cases in the legal pipeline and more than 200 members suffering from what it terms RSI, said: "We are horrified." The union said an appeal was being considered and urged other RSI sufferers not to be disheartened. A spokesman for Reuters said: "We are naturally satisfied with this judgment. Reuters employees are its greatest asset and we employ the very best techniques and procedures to protect and assist them with their work."